Assault rifles in a 5.56 mm evolution: the fielding of new designs and the upgrade of existing weapons will ensure that 5.56 mm remains the predominant assault rifle calibre.
Armada International › Vol. 31 Nbr. 2, April 2007
Linked as:
Armada International › Vol. 31 Nbr. 2, April 2007
Linked as:Summary
Infantry: weapons
See the full content of this document
Extract
Assault rifles in a 5.56 mm evolution: the fielding of new designs and the upgrade of existing weapons will ensure that 5.56 mm remains the predominant assault rifle calibre.
The perceived shortcomings of the 5.56 x 45 mm Nato SS109/US M855 round in the US armed forces-led campaign in Afghanistan has provoked the fiercest debate about the optimum calibre for assault rifles since the US Army decided that the 5.56 mm M193 cartridge would supersede the Nato 7.62 mm cartridge as the standard calibre for its assault rifles 40 years ago. The pressing demands of the Global War on Terror, which is being fought largely in urban areas in Iraq, mean that new and upgraded 5.56 mm assault rifles will equip the American military forces and their Nato and non-Nato allies for at least another generation. However, these will be augmented by a more generous allocation of 5.56 mm and 7.62 mm marksman/sniper rifles than has previously been the case, this to achieve precision engagements at ranges out to 800 metres. Efforts are also underway to field air-bursting 40 mm and possibly 25 mm shoulder-launched grenades to defeat ta...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex Switzerland
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
arrêt nº 5p.187/2005 de iie cour de droit civil, august 09, 2005 | Arrêt nº U 347/04 de IIe Cour de Droit Social, May 02, 2005 | arrêt nº i 681/04 de iie cour de droit social february 22 2005 | arrêt nº 1p.327/2004 de ire cour de droit civil, january 05, 2005 | Sentencia nº 4471 de Consiglio di Stato, August 26, 2008 | sentencia nº 2728 de consiglio di stato, may 20, 2008 | Sentencia nº 1927 de Consiglio di Stato, April 09, 2008 | Sentencia nº 5172 de Consiglio di Stato September 30 2008